la_marquise (
la_marquise) wrote2011-12-05 07:22 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Sexual harassment.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
It looks, I know, as if this is a subject some of us keep banging on about. It's a subject I know I rant about, and people's eyes glaze over and they turn away. But the thing is, I rant because this is a big deal, a big problem, and it isn't going away. I've been going to sf conventions since I was 13. I had my first brush with unwanted male attention at a con when I was 15. (Outside a convention? I was 12.) The last time I experienced harassment was last August, from a drunk in a pub. Being female all too often means being treated as if you are in some ways public property every time you step outside your front door (and sometimes before then, too). It never lets up. How you move, look, speak, stand, breathe, dress: it all comes in for attention. And it can be all but impossible to get others to listen to your concerns, let alone do something about it.
Jim is one of the good guys. There are a lot of you out there, I know. It takes men and women together to deal with this stuff. Speak out, speak up: it's a sad fact of our culture that men are listened to more than women. So use it.
And to my female friends, we're in this together. I've got your back.
no subject
http://backupproject.livejournal.com/profile
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
hugs.
no subject
no subject
Is this still sort of carrying on from whatever the freakiness was that happened at World Fantasy, or just sensible reminders in general? Not that it matters, but I've not been keeping up much.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I heard of one regional North American event which a number of people planned not to attend because the committee had failed to decline the membership application from someone accused of persistent harrassment. The committee responded that it was not for it to decide the truth of such charges, but failed to explain why it appeared to be abstaining from its duty of care towards female members. So yes, Julie, it continues to happen.
no subject
no subject
no subject
In any case, now that I think of it, it would only take one or two well-publicised instances of someone getting a criminal record (and a fine, gaol, flogging, whatever suits in the jurisdiction in which it occurs) to scare a lot of the scum into moderating their behaviour. Because they will never be sure that their next victim (or the con committee) will not do the same. Heads on spikes, that's the ticket.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You, of course, rock. As ever.
no subject
no subject
no subject