la_marquise (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
la_marquise) wrote2010-05-20 10:30 am
la_marquise) wrote2010-05-20 10:30 am
Entry tags:
Cold Aramis
I've been thinking about characters and how we become invested in them -- and, indeed, how we become invested in other people's characters. On some level, it makes sense that I'm invested in Gracielis and Thiercelin and Jehan and Aude and Owain. They started out in my head. It is a delightful surprise when people not in my head like them too.
But I also invest hugely in other people's characters. I care about them, I want to spend time with them, I want to see them succeed and grow. Most of the time, this stays within sensible bounds, but every once in a while the irrational button goes off and that weird little inner voice says 'mine!'
I am all about Aramis. Those of you who've known me a while will know this. Aramis is my ur-hero, my archetype, my perfect fantasy. If Aramis is in it, I will read it (or watch it), even though I know that the only true fix will come from reading about him in the works of Dumas. I am possessive of him: when another person mentions investment in him, I can feel myself bristle. My Aramis (my> marquis!>). It's crazy. This is someone else's creation, built on a minor figure from French history about whom we know almost nothing. I don't want to share him. There is currently a series of mysteries featuring the Musketeers which I buy and read religiously even though the writer -- in my head -- has my Aramis all wrong. In my head, I know he's not mine, he's a character everyone can read about and think about. My adult self knows to play nicely, and is delighted when someone writes something or films something where they have him right (for my value of right). My child self wants to hang on to her things.
I'm not the only person who does this, I suspect. We can become extraordinarily attached to characters and react very badly when something happens to them, even in canon, that hurts them. In my head are various other places where certain characters did not die, did not leave, did not make choice X. This love for the fictional, this engagement, is clearly something we can all do. There is something about Aramis that just works for me, that resonates with me, that works with the way I work, something archetypical, perhaps, that slight, dark, dangerous thing.
So, here's my question: do you do this too? And why?
But I also invest hugely in other people's characters. I care about them, I want to spend time with them, I want to see them succeed and grow. Most of the time, this stays within sensible bounds, but every once in a while the irrational button goes off and that weird little inner voice says 'mine!'
I am all about Aramis. Those of you who've known me a while will know this. Aramis is my ur-hero, my archetype, my perfect fantasy. If Aramis is in it, I will read it (or watch it), even though I know that the only true fix will come from reading about him in the works of Dumas. I am possessive of him: when another person mentions investment in him, I can feel myself bristle. My Aramis (my> marquis!>). It's crazy. This is someone else's creation, built on a minor figure from French history about whom we know almost nothing. I don't want to share him. There is currently a series of mysteries featuring the Musketeers which I buy and read religiously even though the writer -- in my head -- has my Aramis all wrong. In my head, I know he's not mine, he's a character everyone can read about and think about. My adult self knows to play nicely, and is delighted when someone writes something or films something where they have him right (for my value of right). My child self wants to hang on to her things.
I'm not the only person who does this, I suspect. We can become extraordinarily attached to characters and react very badly when something happens to them, even in canon, that hurts them. In my head are various other places where certain characters did not die, did not leave, did not make choice X. This love for the fictional, this engagement, is clearly something we can all do. There is something about Aramis that just works for me, that resonates with me, that works with the way I work, something archetypical, perhaps, that slight, dark, dangerous thing.
So, here's my question: do you do this too? And why?
no subject
For example, in the forthcoming Universal film "Robin Hood vs. The Three Muskateers", Robin is a wealthy American investment banker who visits Britian and is promptly framed for murder. Long story short, he gets out on bail and then goes underground, investigating a London archery club, where he shocks everyone by being the mysterious newcomer who winsthe trounament. Meanwhile, the three muskateers are three Scotland Yard detectives who are best buddies and love to drink and get in lots of brawls, and are assigned to this case specifically in the belief that they will screw it up (original, yes????). It turns out it's all part of an evil plot by convince the UK that capitalist American bankers are sociopathic killers, when really they are great guys who just want to party and create more wealth for all. It ends with the Muskateers helping Robin reveal the perfidious plot of an ambitious PM wannabe, and Robin recovering 100 billion euros in misappropriated assets. But he steals a thousand of it and give it to a kid who needs a new bicycle, because his archery success has him identifying with the legend, and another thousand to give to his new detective buddies, who are having trouble paying their rent. But they think they should spend it all on a fun night out! Everyone heads off to a Picadilly pub to drink pint after pint of Guiness!!!!!
In the morning, Robin wakes up hungover in bed with this hot chick named Dart Canyon, and text message from Aramis saying the Muskateers have been kidnapped, need help!
Thus setting up the SEQUEL!!!!
"Robin Hood vs The Three Muskateers II: My French Frenemies!"
In which Robin goes to France to save the Muskateers, but they've been brainwashed, and are out to kill poor Robin!!!
no subject
no subject